The End of Zionist Judaism



Israel is the graveyard of Zionism

Jerusalem is its tombstone


Zionist Judaism, like the other two Abrahamic religions, Pauline Christianity and Muhammad's Islam, is founded on religious fraud. One of the most fraudulent claims of Jews is to have exclusive God-given rights to the land of Canaan, known as the Holy Land, Palestine. Like the other central myths of Judaism, e.g., Moses and the Exodus story, the conquering of Canaan, the United Kingdoms of David and Solomon, the original story of Abraham being a "Hebrew", it's all totally bogus, nothing more than another set of tribal myths of origin, myths as factual as the story of Adam and Eve and Noah and the Flood. Hebrew priests were the first Hollywood Script writers, a nomadic sheep and goat herding people who envied their powerful neighbors, Egypt, Mesopotamia, so they invented a whole phony history for themselves. The Torah, Tanakh was the world's first Fake News Channel.

Scholarship refutes basic Zionist Judaism claims to Palestine yet Israeli Jews, all convert descendants themselves, are using ancient Hebrew myths of origin as rationale for killing Palestinians who refuse to bow down to Israeli imperialism and domination. Thus the whole religion of Judaism is exposed as little more than tribal xenophobia and tribal narcissism expressed in religious languages, deities, legendary founders and religious motifs borrowed from more advanced ancient neighboring civilizations, Egypt, Sumeria-Mesopotamia, Assyria, Persia, India, Canaan, but especially Egypt where Judah priests borrowed without attribution, the Egyptian Taurowet astro-theology to be the basis for their Torah ideas.


Judaism is the world's first xenophobic religious cult

Judaism set the Abrahamic model for totalitarian control of society by a priestly class.

The later totalitarian religions, Roman Catholicism and Muhammad's Islam, modeled their religious control systems on the Jewish model. The power of Judaism to continue the fraud even into the 3rd Millennium is evidence of the power of religiously based politics to cover their tracks and still generate seemingly endless social warfare.


What's in a name?


"Israel": meaning according to Hebrew - - "He fights with EL" and this name says it all by exposing Judaism's grandiose narcissism to all who ponder how any human group could imagine honoring fighting with the God who supposedly created them? No one is more powerful than God but a narcissistic group convinced themselves that they were, that they could indeed overthrow EL Elyon and substitute their tribal god Yahweh in EL's place. And they did.

The ruse has succeeded in pulling the wool over the eyes of Jews themselves and the Christian West for well over 2000 years but it cannot withstand modern historical research and critical analysis. These are the End Times of Zionism and the religious and moral authority of Judaism. Everything morally wrong with the doctrines of Judaism is clearly shown to the whole world in the actions of modern Israel.

For the historical record to correct Judaism misinformation, "Israel" is a contraction of the three primary gods of Egypt worshiped by the ancient Israelites who were part of the Hyksos invaders: Isis (moon), Ra (sun), EL (Saturn). The original Israelites took their tribal name from these highest gods of Egypt and the one top God of Canaan.


Lack of Forgiveness

What irked Yeishu/Jesus Christ about rabbinical Judaism


Characteristic of grandiose narcissism is the inability to forgive and this anti-social behavior permanently marks the Jewish mindset. "Never forget" and almost every day one can find another Jewish Holocaust promotion because narcissists fly into narcissistic rage when thwarted in any way. How dare Gentiles slaughter Jews! Who cares about other ethnic groups suffering ungodly genocides, only Jewish dead count, hence, Jewish Holocaust Memorials set up like Jewish P.R. firms promoting Jews and Israel showcasing Jewish racist persecution of Arab Gentile Palestinians who are the Gentile scapegoats Judaism, as Israel's state religion, gets to beat up with impunity.

It's why Christianity's forgiveness of sin is seen as such a threat. God's Chosen Ones cannot sin. Because Judaism is based on a racist division of humanity into two groups, those special to God, Jews, and all the rest, Gentiles, who are to be considered less than Jews in God's eyes. To reinforce the racist element the religious literature of Judaism is filled with stories showing how God never forgets or forgives enemies of Jews. This maintains the division, especially as it warns Jews never to leave the cult because if they do they will not be forgiven. Cult loyalty supersedes everything else as in Judaism, believing in God is of secondary importance.

The Israeli nuclear armaments whistle-blower, Mordechai Vanunu, found this out as Israelis kept him locked away for 19 years as of this writing and still won't let him enjoy citizen's rights even though he's served his sentence. Any Jew who publicly criticizes Zionism or Israel receives several times the amount of rebuke by fellow Jews as would a Gentile. Like Christian forgiveness of sins, the African conception of "Obuntu" or forgiveness of past hatreds and crimes of hate through recognition that we are all one humanity, all of us a part of God, is lost on Israeli Jews. Narcissists do not forgive their enemies. Similarly, the Jewish Holocaust is world's only holocaust memorial that refuses to ever forgive Gentiles, using this event as proof of ever-lurking Gentile "anti-Semitism" as Jews urge fellow Jews to "never forget", i.e., never forgive.


Species Defense


It is the evolutionary reason why Judaism's enterprise to create a separate Jewish race will always fail. Our human species has been successful precisely because of intermarriage and not just marriage between homo sapiens at that. Archaeological digs in Israel itself prove that pre-historic Canaan was the crossroads meeting grounds between Homo sapiens moving north out of Africa  and European Neanderthals moving south. Judaism's anti-Gentile racism goes against human evolution. Ironic that European Jews are recreating that same pattern of European racial invasion from the north producing intense racial interaction between Europeans and Arab Palestinians.

The real reason why Jews have suffered so much persecution throughout the Jewish cult lifespan is most easily understood from a bio-sociological p.o.v. Two human traits are at work here: One is the biological species defense mechanism that brings out hostility against another human species competing with our species, our race, our ethnic community. That's why there are no Neanderthals left and why in America, all traces of "Asian Caucasians" are gone.

Judaism's primary goal was to establish a separate race, actually a separate species, of human beings from the Goyim according to Jewish racial purity ideas found in the Talmud. Gentiles, finding this out and seeing Jews in powerful social positions controlling Gentile lives, periodically reacted and reacted negatively to the unconscious threat to the species.

The second human trait seen in hostility towards Jews is seen in Gentile reaction to Jewish separation from Gentile society. Human societies overcome group barriers to social intercourse in a number of differing ways; with wars, with trade, nationalism, common religions, sex and food sharing. When you've got a distinct group within your social group that refuses to touch members of your social group, refuses to eat with members of your social group, refuses to let members of your social group marry their sons or daughters, and when you're the majority population and not well versed in civilized life and protection of human rights virtually unknown, well, you've got a mixture for a time bomb of frustration, anger, and violence that periodically went off. It's pretty simple biological group behavior really.

What Jews call "anti-Semitism" is the inevitable negative reaction Gentile groups will have to having a human group in their midst that is attempting to become a separate species of humanity, and not only separate but one seeking control of political power over their non-Jewish neighbors whom their religion teaches them to consider less than human. Jewish religious rejection of common social bonding mechanisms means that Jews reject the biologically-based behavior patterns that human beings use to overcome group barriers in order to form larger "family" identities, the basis of state and nation building. And this Jewish rejection has never sat well with Gentiles and never will because it's racism, blanket racism, much like white supremacy is blanket racism with its condemnation of people of color.


"Now therefore, if you will indeed obey My voice and keep My covenant, then you shall be a special treasure to Me above all people"--Exodus 19:5

What arrogance! Imagine trying to "own" God but that's exactly what Judah priests tried to do - - by gulling believers into thinking their writings were the official "Word of God" and so they could write that their God loved Israelites, Hebrews, whatever, were God's favorite, and the wonder was, it worked! Ever since Pauline Christianity highjacked Judaism's myths of origin as foundation for Christianity the world has swallowed these patent lies of ancient Judah priests. Why? Because there are so many Christians and they went around the world messing with people's lives by inflicting these "believers in Christ" with Judah's false histories and outright plagiarisms of older pagan mythologies. When your religious beliefs shut down critical thinking, when your culture is lacking basic liberal education for its people, any religious b.s. is potentially believable. But even supposedly smart cultures can be totally deceived. Germany remains the world example on that one, with the U.S. not far behind with the rightwing Trump phenomena.


Judaism was a genetic breeding program to create a separate master race called "Jews"


Perhaps remembered from the ancient Brahmin past and relearned in Egypt from seeing how Egypt was ruled by interbreeding Egyptian aristocratic families creating the lineage of Pharaohs, Hebrew/Israelites set off to create themselves a "holy seed" (Ezra 9:2) separate from the rest of humanity. This racial "purity" goal was what interested Hitler who tried his own hand at it. For Germans.

I believe the Semitic Jews learned about Hindu Vedic religious ideas through the Hindu merchants living in Yemen where there was a thriving incense trade route business with myrrh and frankincense coming from India. In any event, the Jewish religion shares much in common with Brahmin racism. See the Hebrews and Brahmins  page for more on this association of religious ideas.


The biological argument against racial purity and xenophobia


"Traditionally, the Plain People — Amish and Mennonite descendants of 18th-century German and Swiss Anabaptists — have shunned many modern inventions and married among themselves to protect their faith-driven way of life. The Amish, like other close ethnic groups around the world, have high rates of inherited disorders because of the emergence of recessive genes passed through generations. Distantly related members marry and increase the odds of being unknowing carriers of the disorders."

Read Jews instead of Amish in the statement above or any self-chosen inbreeding genetic group of peoples.


Spiritual consciousness cannot be bred


This is the basic reason why Judaism faces its End Times in the New Millennium. The "Master Race" project has fallen in total disgrace in the intellectual life of humanity after Hitler borrowed the idea from Jews and showed the world what happens when human beings take this racist concept and give it the stamp of official government policy. Like Nazi Germany, Apartheid South Africa, modern Israel shows the same racist propensity by banning Palestinians (Gentiles) in their own homeland from equal participation in government policies and a joint-Palestinian-Israeli life. Jews will claim right and left that Judaism is not a racist ideology but the truth is Judaism is most definitely racist at its core belief system. It is only in modern times that the Jewish racial policy of forbidding intermarriage with Gentiles has been seriously breached. The more Jews intermarry with Gentiles the weaker the religion of Judaism becomes as racial purity was always at the heart of Jewish theology, racial prejudice against Goyim gave Judaism its ideological mandate for territorial aggression--Goyim in the Holy Land weren't the Chosen of God--Canaan, the land that was theirs, the Jewish tribal god said Jews could take and have for all for themselves. And kill all who resist.

I write this in opposition to racial prejudice but then how do I explain my own spiritual consciousness? I'm mostly Gentile but by Jewish law, Jewish because of my mother's and her mother's Jewish ancestry. My father's Gentile family is filled with religious fervor but my mom's side, my "Jewish" side, they weren't particularly religious, certainly not Jewish because they didn't know about mom's and grandma's Jewish genetic history. Well, here I am, another Jewish-Gentile prophesy bearer and half-breed, like Yeishu ben Pantera was.


Judaism sells the falsehood that "Gentiles are inherently anti-Semitic and crazy"


"Jews have suffered so long because they bear the burden of God in history. Anti-Semitism is symptomatic of an animus against God, an animus deeply lodged in every person."

So goes the Catholic apologetic to Jews to explain the Holocaust and why Gentiles in the past have so very often reacted violently towards Judaism and towards Jews themselves. But Jews do not own either pogroms or ethnic cleansing Holocausts. Jews are not the only people in the world to suffer mightily from Holocausts but Jews are the only people in the world making an industry off their Holocaust, the only ones using their Holocaust as rationale to bring another Holocaust to another ethnic group, Palestinians, whose only "crime" it is is to be in the way of Zionist obliteration of Palestine.

Judaism teaches Jews to break all the human rules for overcoming xenophobia that has allowed human communities different from each other to be able to come together and co-exist in peace and harmony. Sharing of food is one of the primary means groups use to come together in peace. Judaism teaches Jews they are not to eat with Gentiles. Being able to socialize with other groups is also not allowed Jews according to Judaism who are forbidden such socialization. Finally, the major method human beings use to overcome xenophobia is intermarriage which is strictly forbidden Jews by Jewish law. So the next time you hear the Jewish refrain of "inherent hatred of Jews" by Gentiles, remember who it is that provokes hostility to Gentile/Jewish social intermixing and what would naturally result from that hostility.


Other People's Holocausts ignored in Jewish narcissistic obsession with their own


I have worked closely for years with a local Native American tribe here in California where the Tribal Council Chairman can remember himself as a boy running for his life because white ranchers wanted to kill him, there being a bounty on Indians killed still on the books of California law up until the late 1930's or thereabouts. The tribe I worked with is composed of descendents of remnants of several now extinct tribes. These people lost EVERYTHING! not only their lives and their land but their language, their culture, their artifacts, everything that identified them as a people was taken away in what was for them a far far greater Holocaust because unlike Jews, they had no back-up cultural reserves in which to renew themselves.

And the way they were killed? Is death to innocent women, children and men by being hacked to death, shot to death, women raped and then killed, children stuffed into reed baskets and drowned in our rivers, unwanted Indian refugees from concentration camps taken out to sea and pushed overboard to drown, are Jewish deaths in the camps any worse? Tremendous numbers of human beings have suffered Holocausts. It gives none of them right to inflict Holocaust on someone else.


 "Elijah must come first and restore all things"

--Matthew 17:11?

Why Elijah must come first


God in THEIR wisdom allowed warning Signs to be placed within the Bible to warn believers away from false spiritual paths. One of them was the prophetic demand that "Elijah must come first and restore all things." When you learn about Judah's god-switching and elevation of the Israelite tribal god, Yahweh, to EL ELyon's position, you learn why God wants us to "return to the scene of the crime" so to speak. Without discovering that God Most High was originally EL Elyon and not Yahweh, or fancied up "YHWH", you never learn why Christianity isn't Judaism, why Christianity is actually a throwback God intended to correct Judah's spiritual error by restoring the polytheistic relationship of Father and Son to the Godhead. "Elijah" means "My EL is Yah" but that wasn't the original case. Christian believers must read Deuteronomy 32 and find out how Judah priests swindled Jewish believers by falsely elevating Yahweh to EL Elyon's position as top God.

There is a tendency now in Christian circles to downplay the original impulse that set early Christian Jews apart from Pharisaic Jews. The Advent of the Son of Man Messiah Yeishu-Jesus marks the beginning of a two thousand year old spiritual battle to 1) restore EL Elyon as God Most High where Judaism has posited their tribal god Yahweh as God Most High, and 2) to restore revelation, divine inspiration as seen in the Prophets as the authority of Scripture and not intellectual critique as seen in the Rabbis commentaries on the Torah. In the telling story of how EL Elyon supposedly wants to be known to the world as Yahweh, hundreds of years after the fall of Canaan's national power and during the great disruption of the Babylonian Exile priests and scribes of Judah pulled the wool over their fellow tribal believers eyes and memories of what had gone before. A new myth was created to replace the worship of EL as God Most High and the worship of Asherah, the Great Goddess as EL's wife and Divine Feminine guaranteer of the Life of the land. Instead of the traditional role of Yahweh as an angelic Presence as the Son of God personally responsible as tribal god for the guidance of the Israelites within the Canaanite federation of tribal nations, the Jewish writers remade Yahweh to replace, supplant his Father, EL Elyon. It never worked. A war god hasn't the wisdom to rule humanity.


Children of a lesser God


Judaism, in falsely elevating and worshipping a lower god, is fraudulent from the very beginning. The erasure of Canaanite EL Elyon's memory from the Hebrew people constitutes deicide and it is for deicide of God Most High that Jews are being punished seemingly eternally until Judaism disappears as a viable religion and joins the other ancient primitive and dead religions in the past where they can no longer steer humanity backwards. Or at least until Jews themselves so completely revamp Judaism as to make it indistinguishable from Christianity. Christianity is actually the Jewish salvation of Judaism as it returns Judaism to its spiritual roots in revelatory guidance from God Most High instead of leading Jews by the doctrines of priests, i.e., corruptible men.


Jewish and Pauline Christian Deicide


The Passion of Christ is the Holy One of Heaven & Earth's violent memory of the deicide of EL Elyon, God Most High. In the Passion story Jesus Christ stands in for Yahweh and takes the punishment deserved for those who would kill the real God Most High and worship a lower god in the Father's place. The Jews never understand and neither do Pauline Christians who are themselves attached to Judaism's false god by Pauline doctrine which posits Christianity as a grafted branch onto the mainstem of Judaism with its worship of the Fraud of Israel. The antagonism of Gentile nations and Christianity towards Judaism reflects the Christian charge of deicide only the deicide isn't of the mythical God-man Jesus Christ but the deicide of his Father, EL Elyon, God Most High. Only when Jews acknowledge this fraud in their religious past and follow Yeishu-Jesus' way out of the spiritually dead end of Judaism will they be spared from continuing persecution by the Gentile nations worshipping the true spiritual Father, EL Elyon, God Most High via the teachings of Yeishu-Jesus or via those of reformed Islam.

The "Al" part of Allah is EL, God Most High, which when the true character of EL Elyon is again known to all Muslims and the world via historical research, will work towards the same goal as desired by Jesus, i.e., establishment of the Kingdom of God in our hearts, mind and souls. Established in our hearts and minds it will in turn be established in our personal and community relationships with others as this is the necessary path to establishing the true Kingdom of God, the Realm of the Holy One of Heaven & Earth, the realm of peace and goodwill between all the peoples and nations of the world, not a one of them treated as outsider children in God's Holy Family. This goal is impossible for Judaism to accomplish because Judaism is based on inequality, on human Insider/Outsider dichotomies that do not exist in God's Creation where all human beings are created equal in God's love and guidance to spiritual maturity. How convenient that the tribal god of Israel, Yahweh, loves the Israelites more than any other people.

It is amazing how the world's first narcissistic and paranoid group mind religious cult has lasted into our modern times, how it is still causing mischief with the Nations, and how so few recognize Judaism for what it really is! Classic Cult doctrines and behavior patterns--paranoia of Outsiders, totalitarian mind control of cult members, absolute obedience to cult authorities, and lastly, the most telling sign, willingness to destroy the lives of innocents rather than question obedience unto death of the cult's religious doctrines. I ask my fellow Jews to consider this: Just what exactly is the difference between followers of Jim Jones and David Koresh and the suicide deaths and murders of Jonestown and Waco, and the followers of Moses at Masada when Jews were willing to kill their own children in obedience to the Leader, to Moses and the Cult rather than save them. The Cult becomes more important than children's lives and that becomes the lasting condemnation of Judaism and all totalitarian religious systems.

When Judaism is shown to be just as fraudulently conceived and promoted as any modern cult phenemena, it behooves us all to expose it for what it is: a false religion as no true Creator divided humankind into loved and unloved catagories; even the foundational Genesis Creation story of Judaism admits this. As Jesus pointed out, no kingdom divided against itself shall stand. Judaism attempts to divide the Kingdom of God into Jewish insiders and controllers in their Messianic dream of Israel, and Gentiles as outsiders and the ones controlled.


YHWH, the Fraud of Israel


Yah: The Midian-Egyptian connection to the origin of Yahweh


"In its earliest attestations the name Yah refers to the moon as satellite of the earth. Yah then becomes conceptualised as a lunar deity, iconographically anthropomorphic but whose manifestations, from the hieroglyphic evidence, can include the crescent of the new moon, the ibis and the falcon- comparable to the other moon deities, Thoth and Khonsu. It is probable that contact with Middle Eastern states in Palestine, Syria and Babylonia was instrumental in the development of Yah as a deity. Certainly the zenith of Yah's popularity lay in the period following the Middle Kingdom when immigration from the Levant was high and princes from Palestine, known as the Hyksos, rulers, dominated Egypt. These foreigners may well have looked for a lunardeity analogous to the Akkadian moon-god Sin who had an important temple at Harran in north Syria. Strangely, it is with the Theban royal family eventually responsible for the expulsion of these alien rulers that there is a difinite inclination for names involving the mood-god Yah. The daughter of Seqenenre Tao I (Dynasty XVII) is Yah-hotep ('Yah is content'). The founder of Dynasty XVIII was called Yahmose ('Yah is born') and the same element is in the nameo f his wife Yahmose-Nefertari. Most likely the Middle Eastern deity who gave the stimulus to the adoption of Yah is the influence behind the name Kamose, the brother of Yahmose, who began the final thrust against the Hyksos domination. Kamose ('the bull is born') might be the Egyptian equivalent of the epithet applied to Sin describing him as a 'young bull... with strong horns' (i.e. the tips of the crescent moon). This imagery would be totally compatible with the Egyptian concept of the pharaoh as an invinvible bull. In the tomb of Tuthmosis III (Dynasty XVII), the pharaoh whose campaigns took him to the banks of the Euphrates river, there is a scene where the king is accompanied by his mother and three queens, including Sit-Yah 'daughter of the moon-god'. Traces of his cult beyond this period are sporadic." - - from A Dictionary of Egyptian Gods and Goddesses by George Hart


Yah, was the name of the primary god of the Midians into which Moses supposedly married by marrying the daughter of a Midian priest. Yah was also the name of the desert god worshipped by the Bedoins. It is likely this name is the same one Canaanites applied to Yamm as Yaw or Yawu.

Yahti, was the name of the Egyptian Father god. Hebrew monotheism under Judah priests followed the trail blazed by Pharaoh Akenaton who overthrew all the Egyptian gods and goddesses substituting his Aten (only god) Ra (sun god) or Amen (hidden god) Ra as the only god there is. There is considerable evidence linking the story of Moses to Egyptians priests and "habiru" outcasts forced to flee Egypt when the Semitic (read Canaanite) Hyksos Pharaohs lost power and then again later when Akenaton and his monotheistic revolution went sour.


wpe25.jpg (75942 bytes)

The Origin of Yahweh as Yamm, Canaanite god of the sea



Yamm, a.k.a. Lotan, Leviathan, Tiamat.

"Yamm, from the Canaanite word Yam, (Hebrew ??) meaning "Sea", is one name of the Ugaritic god of Rivers and Sea. Also titled Judge Nahar ("Judge River"), he is also one of the 'ilhm (Elohim) or sons of El, the name given to the Levantine pantheon. Others dispute the existence of the alternative names, claiming it is a mistranslation of a damaged tablet. Despite linguistic overlap, theologically this god is not a part of the later subregional monotheistic theology, but rather is part of a broader and archaic Levantine polytheism.

Yam is the deity of the primordial chaos and represents the power of the sea untamed and raging; he is seen as ruling storms and the disasters they wreak. The gods cast out Yam from the heavenly mountain Sappan (modern Jebel Aqra; "Sappan" is cognate to Tsephon (Tsion). The seven-headed dragon Lotan is associated closely with him and the serpent is frequently used to describe him."

Of all the gods, despite being the champion of El, Yam holds special hostility against Baal Hadad, son of Dagon. Yam is a deity of the sea and his palace is in the abyss associated with the depths, or Biblical tehwom, of the oceans. (This is not to be confused with the abode of Mot, the ruler of the netherworlds.) In Ugaritic texts, Yam's special enemy Hadad is also known as the "king of heaven" and the "first born son" of El, whom ancient Greeks identified with their god Kronos, just as Baal was identified with Zeus, Yam with Poseidon and Mot with Hades. Yam wished to become the Lord god in his place. In turns the two beings kill each other, yet Hadad is resurrected and Yam also returns. Some authors have suggested that these tales reflect the experience of seasonal cycles in the Levant."--Wikipedia



The name "Benjamin" according to Hebrew means "Son of the right hand" but that's just more Judah priesthood propaganda and redefinition in order to hide the name's actual pagan origin. "Benjamin" means "Sons of Yamm", the Tribe meant to control Jerusalem for Israel.


EL Elyon renames Yamm Yaw or Yawu:


"The pantheon of ancient Sumer was borrowed by Sumer's northern neighbors, the Semitic peoples of Mesopotamia. Generally, they substituted Semitic names for the Sumerian gods, but the structure of the pantheon, including the distinction between the Divine Progenitors and the Assembly of Gods was maintained in the Semitic religions--although each Semitic people typically substituted the name of their local chief god for that of the king among the gods of the Assembly. Among the Babylonians, the children of El, collectively known as the Elohim were subordinate to their Father El. They presided individually over the various stars and planets as well as over their individual earthly estates.

In Babylonian times, the Elohim were ruled by a son of El called Marduk, who could be seen in the heavens as the "wandering star" we call Jupiter today. Among the Canaanites, neighbors and political competitors of the Hebrews, he was called simply "Lord" or Ba'al, while his true name (Hadu or, in some dialects Hadad) was known only to his priests. Ba'al's chief rival for kingship among the gods was Yamm, meaning "Sea", who also sometimes took the guise of a storm-god. His personal name was Yaw or, in some texts, Yawu. For instance, in the Epic of Ba'al, El, speaking to Athirat (Asherah) about their son Yamm says, "The name of my son is Yaw, Oh Goddess. . ." The name of Yamm is intriguingly similar to the name of the Hebrew deity, Yahweh, the short form of which was Yah. The similarity of names is paralleled by a similarity of roles, since Ba'al was considered to be the chief rival of Yahweh by the Hebrews. Although this identification not a certain one, the two are thought to have been the same deity by some scholars.

Yamm was the Canaanite god of the sea who also represented Chaos in the yearly nature saga that the Canaanite religion was based on, i.e., the death of crops at winter and their rebirth at spring represented by God or God's lieutenant being taken down into the Abyss or hell there to be rescued (Spring resurrection)by a Savior god or goddess, Baal and Anath for Canaanites, Marduk and Ishtar for Babylonians. This pagan mythology became incorporated in the Easter resurrection tradition of Jesus Christ. According to the Canaanite myths, Baal seized the throne of El with a surprise attack in the palace of El on Mount Sapan. Baal then claimed Asherah and Anath as his wives. Yamm formed an alliance with his father, El, and attempted to drive Baal from the throne. However, Baal defeated Yamm, who had taken the form of a sea dwelling dragon.

This archetypal myth finds what is believed to be its earliest fully intact version in Canaanite mythology. In the beginning, the people of Canaan taught there was a rivalry between two great primordial deities, `Yamm' and `Baal'. Yamm, known also as `Prince Sea', was "identified with or accompanied by two fearsome sea monsters, Litan (the Biblical Leviathan) and Tunnan (the Biblical Tannin)". This sea-god Yamm was itself thought to be a sea-monster, being variously referred to as `the dragon', `the twisting serpent', and `the seven-headed monster'. Since this Canaanite sea-god may be an ancient symbol for the Primordial Soul, which would have functioned as a controlling `judge' over its partner the Spirit, it is worth noting that the other name commonly used for Yamm was `Judge River'. And Baal, in the role of the young storm-god, was variously called `Lord of the Storm', `Rider of the Clouds', and `Conqueror'. Again, at first this sea-god Yamm was master over Baal, holding power and control over him. But Baal ultimately overthrew Yamm:

The club danced in Baal's hands,

like a vulture from his fingers;

it struck Prince Sea on the skull,

Judge River between the eyes;

Sea stumbled;

he fell to the ground;

his joints shook;

his frame collapsed.

Baal captured and drank Sea

he finished Judge River.

Successfully defeating Sea, Baal gained absolute authority, securing an `eternal kingdom' for himself. But after this supreme victory, Baal was defeated by Mot, the god of death, and was forced to enter the underworld. Yamm became Yahweh and has continued the war with Baal his arch-enemy all through the Old Testament period. Baal, the original "Lord", is today still in the underworld..lurking.."

- - from Stories from Ancient Canaan by Michael David Coogan.


Yamm becomes Yahweh

Yamm was the Canaanite god of the sea who also represented Chaos in the yearly nature saga that the Canaanite religion was based on, i.e., the death of crops at winter and their rebirth at spring represented by God or God's lieutenant being taken down into the Abyss or hell there to be rescued (Spring resurrection) by a Savior god or goddess (Baal and Anath for Canaanites, Marduk and Ishtar for Babylonians). This mythology became the Easter resurrection tradition of Jesus Christ.

When ancient Canaan collapsed in political power, Hebrews substituted their tribal god for EL's top position but Yahweh never ever had the wisdom or compassion of EL so Yahweh's reign has been as a fraud, a usurper god, a lower god posing as the highest God.
The old Gnostic Jews and Gnostic Christians knew that Yahweh was a usurper lower god but somehow John hit the nail on the head by recognizing Yamm in Yahweh, that symbol most clearly showing in Revelation 13's the Beast from the Sea which is Yamm as he was symbolized as a seven-headed sea-monster in his form as Chaos. The head that has the mortal wound that doesn't die symbolizes the rebirth of Yamm as Yahweh.

The second beast symbolizes Moses who brought fire down from heaven, the frontlets bearing the name of Yahweh which are the Mark of the beast. John the Revelator believes Jewish religious authorities screwed everything up when they were exiled in Babylon and added Persian and other pagan notions to the spiritual Torah that the 5 books of Moses represented. That is why Babylon takes the hit in Revelation-it doesn't stand for Rome or America or Russia or whatever-it always stood for Babylon. Now, given these historical literary references pointing to truth that Yahweh was never God Most High and Jews fudged the historical record showing EL, not Yahweh as the true God the Father, are we surprised to find Gnostic Jews condemning the God of the Jews as an imposter, a usurper god? Did Yahweh pull a Lucifer act and become God Most High or has the Fraud of Israel been caught on tape?

Take a look at the Gospel of John chapter 8 where Jesus rips the Jews for worshipping the devil. Then take a look at Revelation's famous Beast from the Sea and see Yamm again in his seven-headed sea-monster form, like Leviathan or Babylon's Tiamat. John "knew" who Yahweh was long before historians came along on the scene to confirm the forged identity of Yahweh. John's gospel and Revelation continue the Gnostic spiritual revolt against the tribal god of the Jews but unlike the Thomasian type Gnostics, John's Gnosis hinges on belief that Jesus as man was God in the flesh. It makes sense to see John's Gospel as a Pauline Christian answer to Thomas and the Gnostics who held to the Spirit of Christ manifesting in Jesus did not make him a god but only the human vessel of God's announcing God's goodness towards humankind.


Gnostics were more in line with the Jewish conception of the Messiah as a human being, a king or leader of men who mirrors the will of God Most High. However, the Gnostics like John the Revelator somehow discovered the tribal god of the Jews wasn't God Most High, never was in fact, while Hebrew scribes and priests during the Babylonian captivity wrote the mythology of their lower god, Yahweh, becoming EL, the Canaanite God Most High. Only Yahweh couldn't be EL as Yahweh was already one of the sons of EL, Yamm to be exact, Chaos and Prince Sea as his appellations were known before EL changed his name to "Yah" or "Yahwu" i.e. the origin of Yahweh. Yamm, even though a Canaanite god of the sea was the tribal god of the Benjamites (meaning "Sons of Yamm") and Jerusalem was the center of the tribe of Benjamin before Judah swallowed it up.

Yamm, as Chaos, was represented as a seven headed sea monster whose female Babylonian counterpart was known as Tiamat. "Rahab" is this sea monster's name given by Isaiah which makes the prophesy of the Messiah stemming from "the Root of Jesse" very interesting as Rahab the Canaanite whore who sold out her fellow countrymen to Joshua's genocidal invasion and became a founding female figure in the Davidic lineage. Now read Revelation 13 and see John using heavy symbolism to describe Yahweh as Yamm, the seven headed Beast from the Sea whose mortal wound is healed because while Yamm is defeated by Baal in the Canaanite mythology, Yamm is resurrected as Yahweh to war against Baal again and again as these two enemy gods battle it out in archetypal imagery.

Meanwhile EL, God Most High, presides over His squabbling children little knowing one of them, Yamm-Yahweh-YWHW, has been falsely elevated to His throne as the Most High. Yamm-Yahweh never had the temperament to be the Sage King that EL was. Yamm, Yahweh, Baal, these are lower military or war gods who rule with force and fear instead of wisdom and compassion as EL ruled the Canaanite Divine Assembly, that word in Greek being "Armageddon". The real Armageddon is one's choice to follow the schizophrenic lower god Yahweh who issues compassionate commandments one place and ghastly genocidal murderous commandments another place, or to follow EL, who never threatened human beings with fear of damnation but was always there for them when they asked for forgiveness of their sins.

No wonder the Canaanites loved EL and called Him "The Compassionate One", "The Kindly One", "The Friendly One". EL is Jesus' "abba" his "daddy" and that is why Jesus' teachings are so different from those of Yahweh. Whether a real human being which I believe Jesus was as Yeshu ben Pantera, or whether a mythical being as Jesus Christ of the Gospels, this person modeled for all time the Son of God, the human being who faithfully follows the Way of God Most High. Biomystical Christianity believes that somehow Jesus came to understand the difference between EL and Yahweh which can be seen in John's text relating Jesus back to Psalm 82. John has Jesus representing God but Biomystical Christianity believes a deeper meaning was given through John's text in order to inform us of the difference between the Jewish God as Yahweh and the God the Father Jesus claims to represent. It makes sense of Jesus' statements in John 8:41-47:

"You do the deeds of your father."..."If God were your Father, you would love me, for I proceeded forth and came from God; nor have I come of myself, but He who sent me. Why do you not understand my speech? Because you are not able to listen to my word. You are of your father the devil, and the desires of your father you want to do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaks a lie, he speaks from his own resources, for he is a liar and the father of it. But because I tell the truth, you do not believe me. Which of you convicts me of sin? And if I tell the truth, why do you not believe me? He who is of God hears God's words; therefore you do not hear, because you are not of God."

Psalm 82 was prophetic: "I said, 'You are gods, and all of you are children of the Most High. But you shall die like men, and fall like one of the princes." All the Canaanite deities died except for EL, Asherah, and Astarte (Ishtar) who continue on disguised in form: The Spirit of EL was continued into the Judeo-Christian epic within the Messiah prophesy of "Immanuel", literally "EL is with us". That Spirit became the Spirit of Christ with Jesus. Yet Jesus knew that he had to take the fall for his namesake, Yahweh.

The Holy One had Yahweh die on the cross through the crucifixion of Jesus so that EL could be reborn to the world through the teachings of Jesus Christ, a true "Son of EL" in the Canaanite tradition of the earthly king mirroring the compassion and wisdom of the heavenly King, EL. Asherah was concealed in the Judeo-Christian epic as Her main Canaanite identity, the Tree of Life. As the original Goddess of Wisdom She is a precursor to Sophia, the personification of Wisdom. Astarte or Ishtar reemerged within the Christian Easter worship rituals where Her saving deeds were incorporated into the Christ resurrection mythology. Ishtar was the original deity who descended into hell for three days to rescue the male god and return to heaven. And the Easter celebration items of Easter eggs and hot-cross buns (raisin cakes) were originally dedicated to Her. The Holy One has made sure the Canaanite clan of Gods and Goddesses are not forgotten, even 4000 years later. See the Journey of EL and Asherah chapter for more about how this was accomplished.




The Origin of Yahweh: Yahweh was one of the "sons of EL"

That Yahweh was originally a son of El is attested by a document (KTU 1.1 IV 14) from Ugarit, a Palestinian site occupied by neighbors of Israel. It reads sm . bny . yw . ilt, which translates as "The name of the son of god, Yahweh."

This status as the foremost of the sons of El is remembered in the Song of Moses, one of the oldest of the Hebrew scriptures, in Deuteronomy 32:8-9: "When the Elyon [another name of El] apportioned the nations, when he divided humankind, he fixed the boundaries of the peoples according to the number of the gods [i.e., each god controlled one nation of people]; Yahweh's own portion was his people, Jacob [i.e., the nation of [Israel] his allotted share."

Psalm 82:1: Elohim has taken his place in the assembly of EL, in the midst of the elohim He holds judgment.

Psalm 29:1: Ascribe to Yahweh, O sons of EL, ascribe to Yahweh glory and strength.

Psalm 89:6: For who in the skies can be compared to Yahweh, who among the sons of EL is like Yahweh,

Yahweh was one of those other gods, i.e., a "son of EL".


Spiritual contamination

The Moloch Problem with the God of Abraham


"Moloch was portrayed as a bronze statue which had a calf's head which wore a crown and was seated on a throne...."

 "Inside the statue supposedly there were seven different compartments, one for wheat flour, the second for doves, the third for a lamb, the fourth for a ram, the fifth for a calf, the sixth for a cow, and the seventh for a human child. Moloch is therefore often associated with Mithras and his seven mysterious gates and chambers. Whenever a child was sacrificed a fire was kindled inside the bronze idol and the priests of Moloch beat drums and made other noises to drown out the child's cries of pain."


"Moloch" is the same word in Hebrew as Melech meaning "King"

"A divinity worshipped by the idolatrous Israelites. The Hebrew pointing Molech does not represent the original pronunciation of the name, any more than the Greek vocalization Moloch found in the LXX and in the Acts (vii, 43). The primitive title of this god was very probably Melech, "king", the consonants of which came to be combined through derision with the vowels of the word Bosheth, "shame". As the word Moloch (A.V. Molech) means king, it is difficult in several places of the Old Testament to determine whether it should be considered as the proper name of a deity or as a simple appellative. The passages of the original text in which the name stands probably for that of a god are Lev., xviii, 21; xx, 2-5; III (A. V. I) Kings, xi, 7; IV (II) Kings, xxiii, 10; Is., xxx, 33; lvii, 9; Jer., xxxii, 35.

The chief feature of Moloch's worship among the Jews seems to have been the sacrifice of children, and the usual expression for describing that sacrifice was "to pass through the fire", a rite carried out after the victims had been put to death. The special centre of such atrocities was just outside of Jerusalem, at a place called Tophet (probably "place of abomination"), in the valley of Geennom. According to III (I) Kings, xi, 7, Solomon erected "a temple" for Moloch "on the hill over against Jerusalem", and on this account he is at times considered as the monarch who introduced the impious cult into Israel. After the disruption, traces of Moloch worship appear in both Juda and Israel. The custom of causing one's children to pass through the fire seems to have been general in the Northern Kingdom [IV (II) Kings, xvii, 17; Ezech. xxiii, 37], and it gradually grew in the Southern, encouraged by the royal example of Achaz (IV Kings, xvi, 3) and Manasses [IV (II) Kings, xvi, 6] till it became prevalent in the time of the prophet Jeremias (Jerem. xxxii, 35), when King Josias suppressed the worship of Moloch and defiled Tophet [IV (II) Kings, xxiii, 13 (10)]. It is not improbable that this worship was revived under Joakim and continued until the Babylonian Captivity. On the basis of the Hebrew reading of III (I) Kings, xi, 7,

Moloch has often been identified with Milcom, the national god of the Ammonites, but this identification cannot be considered as probable: as shown by the Greek Versions, the original reading of III (I) Kings, xi, 7, was not Molech but Milchom [cf. also III (I) Kings, xi, 5, 33]; and according to Deut., xii, 29-31; xviii, 9-14, the passing of children through fire was of Chanaanite origin [cf. IV (II) Kings, xvi, 3]. Of late, numerous attempts have been made to prove that in sacrificing their children to Moloch the Israelites simply thought that they were offering them in holocaust to Yahweh. In other words, the Melech to whom child-sacrifices were offered was Yahweh under another name. To uphold this view appeal is made in particular to Jer., vii, 31; xix, 5, and to Ezech., xx, 25-31. But this position is to say the least improbable. The texts appealed to may well be understood otherwise, and the prophets expressly treat the cult of Moloch as foreign and as an apostasy from the worship of the true God.  The offerings by fire, the probable identity of Moloch with Baal, and the fact that in Assyria and Babylonia Malik, and at Palmyra Malach-bel, were sun-gods, have suggested to many that Moloch was a fire- or sun-god."

--from the Catholic Encyclopedia online.


Abraham seeds the Holocaust


"Holocaust" means "burnt offering"


"Hamru" was the name of a sacred precinct of Adad, Assyria. "Eldest son will be burnt in the hamru of the god of Adad." "Hamru" was the Babylonian name for the places worshippers sacrificed firstborn sons to Moloch. Biomystical Christianity asks what is the connection between Yahweh (and it is Yahweh by name who commands Abraham to sacrifice his firstborn son) commanding the sacrifice of Isaac from Abraham and the changing of Abram's name to Abra-ham? Biomystical Christianity say's the major reason followers of the Abrahamic religions seem to never tire of sacrificing children to religious warfare is that the God of Abraham is thoroughly contaminated with Moloch worship, a war god ever hungry for firstborn children sacrificed to show loyalty to god as King more worthy of honoring than honoring love of family.

Right from the beginning with the Hebrew story of Abraham sacrificing Isaac as a firstborn son to be fried in fire for God. Oh, Judaism tries to hide the Moloch connection behind a false face of EL Elyon and Melchizedek, but the words and actions show Moloch worship at work. Moloch a.k.a. Melech a.k.a. Malik a.k.a. Milcom a.k.a. Malachi was an Ammonite deity famous for demanding children, firstborn ones especially, as burnt sacrifice offerings on altars and ovens. Moloch has been the curse of the Jews for a long, long time, e.g., the ovens of the Nazis.

Archeologists in Israel have found much evidence of early Hebrew worship of Yahweh as "Melech"--the Hebrew generic term for "king" that disguising the word's pagan god origin and meaning which is that of Ammonite god we know as Moloch. If one questions the "melech/Moloch" connection they should read 2 Kings 17:31 noting the names of the two Sepharevitie gods, Adrammelech and Anammelech, both of whom demanded children as burnt offerings. The prophets railed against this type of Moloch worship but Gehenna is the spot Hebrews burned their children outside Jerusalem in ovens dedicated to Yahweh as King or Melech.

In Biomystical Christian opinion Jesus one major reason Jesus was sent to us was to purify Yahweh of Molochism. Listen to the Q verses found in Luke 12:4-5"

"And I say to you, My friends, do not be afraid of those who kill the body, and after that have no more that they can do.

But I will show you whom you should fear: Fear Him who, after He has killed, has the power to cast into Gehenna; yes, I say to you, fear Him!"

Traditional Christian interpretation is that Him refers to Satan, but what BC says is that Satan has a historic specific title and worship at that particular site of Gehenna, outside of Jerusalem, and it is the worship of sacrificing children as burnt offerings on altars and ovens, firstborn ones especially yummy to Yahweh as Melech a.k.a. Moloch. Here are two other instances of Moloch worship that can be seen between the lines of Old Testament stories; look at this guy's statement:

"It has been inferred from Abraham's readiness to offer up Isaac at the command of God, from the story of Jephthah and his daughter, and even from the sacrifice of Hiel the Bethelite (1 Kings 16:34), that human sacrifice to Yahweh was an original custom in Israel, and that therefore the God of Israel was no other than Moloch, or at all events a deity of similar character. But these incidents are surely too slender a foundation to support such a theory. "The fundamental idea of the heathen rite was the same as that which lay at the foundation of Hebrew ordinance:" -- The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia

"surely too slender a foundation to support such a theory?" Ok, let's add the Akkadian-Babylonia I think it is term for the sites they had for child sacrifices in ovens outside their cities (too foul a practice to have inside city walls). The term was "hamru".

God changes Abram's name from Abram to Abra-ham. "Hamru"-"Abra-hamru"?. Does the "ham" part signal Abram's willingness to sacrifice his firstborn child  as a burnt offering to prove he was willing give all to God ? To God, but to what God is the question--God as EL, God as Yahweh, or God as Moloch?

The name "Melchizedek" if translated in Canaanite (remember Hebrew is considered a Canaanite dialect by linguists) would be "high priest (Zadok, Zedek, part) of Melech".*

Moloch was a sun god, a fire god, a war god. What kind of celebration does Melchizedek give Abraham? A war victory celebration celebrating Abraham's defeat of rival kings. But Moloch the war god is disguised as EL ELyon and only by becoming familiar with EL as He was known and worshipped in Canaan before the Hebrew takeover do you discover that the Abraham EL is another god entirely. The Canaanite EL didn't mess with earthlings much except to give them atonement for their sins when they asked for it in prayers. EL was not a war god. Baal and other lower storm and sun gods lower did that stuff. EL presided over them and set the example of wise and compassionate rulership. EL was a kindhearted grandfather type hence his Canaanite appellations of EL the Compassionate One, EL the Merciful One, EL the Kindly One. EL the Father of Humanity and all Created Things. No darkside Canaanite stories of EL. No threats to human beings, no demands for absolute obedience or fry in hell, none of that.

And then there is the Canaanite Messianic precedent of the good earthly king is one who becomes a "Son of EL", i.e. he rules as a wise and compassionate king like EL rules in heaven. He is a blessing to all the people, a savior to the oppressed and downtrodden, the widow, and the orphan, the victims of war.  Biomystical Christianity is convinced Jesus made spiritual contact with EL and that is why Jesus' good Father gives instructions that are so different from what one would expect of Yahweh. The Holy One sacrificed Yahweh on the cross through Jesus his namesake so that the Spirit of EL could be released into the world again, released through the Spirit of Christ crucified and resurrected and spread around the globe. A job that's only beginning because traditional Christianity doesn't understand it has attached itself to Judaism's Moloch adulterated Yahweh through Paul and the NT writers that brought the OT God back into the picture with his fire from heaven always ready to fry the disbeliever.

That Malachi is the last official prophet of Judaism again points to the Moloch Problem with the god of Abraham. "Malachi" has as the root of the name, "Moloch". Malachi last prophet points to Moloch problem:

Mal 4:5 "Behold, I will send you Elijah the prophet before the coming of the great and dreadful day of the Lord."

Mt 17:11 "Elijah truly is coming first and will restore all things."

Elijah = EL must again become the dominant face of God the Father to "restore all things".

* Now there's a new root connection found in the name "Melchizedek" that links the whole Abraham story back to Vedic theology with Melchizedek being the name of a legendary Indian prince who worked magic by the name of Melik-Sadaksima. See the End of Abraham chapter.


Judaism is not really monothestic but henotheistic, i.e. worship of a single god while accepting the existence if not authority or power of other gods. "Our God is One" is only true in the sense that the Jews worship one god instead of many like their pagan neighbors. But even there Judaism fudges it's monotheistic claim because there are actually two gods worshiped by Jews: EL Elyon, God Most High, and EL's son, Yahweh. To claim monotheistic belief, Judah through EL Elyon under the bus so Yahweh could drive it.


Yahweh, the Schizophrenic God of Israel


In Biomystical Christian theology, Yahweh, after swallowing EL and perhaps Moloch into himself, becomes schizophrenic, showing a Jeckle & Hyde, good and evil side which can be seen in Yahweh's instructions through the prophets and leaders in the Judeo-Christian epic. Right from the beginning in the Yahweh-ist version of Creation Yahweh demonstrates a deeply flawed character, one that displays a rather pathetic immaturity playing power games with his new human toys, Adam and Eve, taking out his frustrations when they don't behave as he instructs them to by cursing their existence as if he himself had no responsibility for the flaws in his own created beings.

Then there is Yahweh the father of lies who says to Adam that "In the day you eat of it (the tree of knowledge of good and evil) you shall surely die." Adam is recorded in Genesis as have living to the ripe old age of 930 years. Next comes Yahweh the hypocrite who gives Moses the Ten Commandments, one of which prohibits murder and another one prohibiting coveting what is thy neighbor's, yet who turns around and commands Moses to order the slaying of Israelites worshiping their Golden Calf. Then Joshua is ordered to steal the land from the Canaanites and slay them man, woman and child. Also, counter to the Ten Commandments, Yahweh commands killing of adulteresses and apostates in the Mosaic Mitzvot law code.

All in all, Yahweh is touted as a "moral, just, good" God but you sure can't tell it by His instructions or the actions of Hebrews towards their neighbors. Small wonder the Holy One wouldn't tolerate the Hebrew worship of Yahweh worship as the only sanctified worship of Itself. But then again, what would God expect from those who named themselves "Israel", i.e., "he fights with EL"?


"While Venus bore the name of Helel, Yahweh himself was manifest as the "wandering star" Jupiter, the planet of kingship."

St. Jude 1:11-13: "Woe to them! For they have gone the way of Cain, have run greedily in the error of Balaam for profit, and perished in the rebellion of Korah. ...raging waves of the sea, foaming up their own shame; wandering stars for whom is reserved the blackness of darkness forever."


Armageddon has come!


The finishing off of Abraham and all Bible authority with the archeological findings of Israel Finkelstein and Neil Silberman. Below begins the inevitable historic blow to Judaism's Torah/Tanakh as a historically based account of the Jewish people.


The End Times of Jewish myths of origin:

Phantom Wanderers

Two archeologists say the escape from Egypt into Sinai seems highly unlikely.

By Israel Finkelstein and Neil Asher Silberman

(Excerpted from "The Bible Unearthed," The Free Press, 2001)



"In the 13th century, Egypt was at the peak of its authority—the dominant power in the world. The Egyptian grip over Canaan was firm: Egyptian strongholds were built in various places in the country, and Egyptian officials administered the affairs of the region. In the el-Amarna letters, which are dated a century before, we are told that a unit of 50 Egyptian soldiers was big enough to pacify unrest in Canaan.

Throughout the period of the New Kingdom, large Egyptian armies marched through Canaan to the north, as far as the Euphrates in Syria. Therefore, the main overland road that went from the delta along the coast of northern Sinai to Gaza and then into the heart of Canaan was of utmost importance to the pharaonic regime.

The most potentially vulnerable stretch of road--which crossed the arid and dangerous desert of northern Sinai between the delta and Gaza--was the most protected. A sophisticated system of Egyptian forts, granaries and wells was established at a day's march distance along the entire length of the road, which was called the Ways of Horus.

These road stations enabled the imperial army to cross the Sinai peninsula conveniently and efficiently when necessary. The annals of the great Egyptian conqueror Thumose III tell us that he marched with his troops from the eastern delta to Gaza, a distance about 250 kilometers, in ten days. A relief from the day of Ramesses II's father, Pharaoh Seti I (from around 1300 B.C.), shows the forts and water reservoirs in the form of an early map that traces the route from the eastern delta to the southwestern border of Canaan.

The remains of these forts were uncovered in the course of archeological investigations in northern Sinai by Eliezer Oren of Ben Gurion University, in the 1970s. Oren discovered that each of these road stations, closely corresponding to the sites designated on the ancient Egyptian relief, comprised three elements: a strong fort made of bricks in the typical Egyptian military architecture, storage installations for food provisions, and a water reservoir.

Putting aside the possibility of divinely inspired miracles, one can hardly accept the idea of a flight of a large group of slaves fro Egypt through the heavily guarded border fortifications into the desert and then into Canaan in the time of such a formidable Egyptian presence. Any group escaping Egypt against the will of the pharoah would have easily been tracked down not only by an Egyptian army chasing it from the delta, but also by the Egyptian soldiers in the forts in northern Sinai and in Canaan.

Indeed, the biblical narrative hits at the dangers of attempting to flee by the coastal route. Thus the only alternative would be to turn into the desolate wastes of the Sinai peninsula. But the possibility of a large group of people wandering in the Sinai peninsula is also contradicted by archeology.

According to the biblical account, the children of Israel wandered in the desert and mountains of the Sinai peninsula, moving around and camping in different places, for a full 40 years. Even if a number of fleeing Israelites (given in the text as 600,000) is wildly exaggerated, or can be interpreted as representing smaller numbers of people, the text describes the survival of a great number of people under the most challenging conditions. Some archaeological traces of their generation-long wandering in the Sinai should be apparent. However, except for the Egyptian forts along the northern coast, not a single campsite or sign of occupation from the time of Ramesses II and his immediate predecessors and successors has ever been found in Sinai.

It has not been for lack of trying. Repeated archaeological surveys in all regions of the peninsula, including the mountainous area around the traditional site of Mount Sinai, near Saint Catherine's Monastery, has yielded only negative evidence: not a single sherd, no structure, not a single house, no trace of an ancient encampment.

One may argue that a relatively small band of wandering Israelites cannot be expected to leave material remains behind. But modern archeological techniques are quite capable of tracing even the very meager remains of hunter-gatherers and pastoral nomads all over the world. Indeed, the archaeological record from the Sinai peninsula discloses evidence for pastoral activity in such eras as the third millennium B.A.D. and the Hellenistic and Byzantine periods. There is simply no such evidence at the supposed time of the Exodus in the 13th century B.A.D.

The conclusion--that the Exodus did not happen at the time and in the manner described in the Bible--seems irrefutable when we examine the evidence at specific sites where the children of Israel were said to have camped for extended periods during their wandering in the desert (Numbers 33) and where some archaeological indication--if present--would almost certainly be found.

According to the biblical narrative, the children of Israel camped at Kadesh-barnea for 38 of the 40 years of the wanderings. The general location of this place is clear from the description of the southern border of the land of Israel in Numbers 34. It has been identified by archaeologists with the large and well-watered oasis of Ein el-Quedeirat in eastern Sinai, on the border of modern Israel and Egypt. The name Kadesh was probably preserved over the centuries in the name of a nearby smaller spring called Ein Qadis. A small mound with the remains of a Late Iron Age fort stands at the center of this oasis. Yet repeated excavations and surveys throughout the entire area have not provided the slightest evidence for activity in the Late Bronze Age, not even a single sherd left by a tiny fleeing band of frightened refugees."

From 'The Bible Unearthed' by Israel Finkelstein & Neil Asher Silberman. Copyright (C) 2001


As Rabbis Face Facts, Bible Tales Are Wilting


Tony Cenicola/The New York Times

("Tree of Life" in Hebrew), a new Torah and commentary, offers new findings in biblical research, which cast doubt on stories like that in Raphael's "Crossing the Red Sea."

Excerpts From 'Etz Hayim' Essays (March 9, 2002):

"Abraham, the Jewish patriarch, probably never existed. Nor did Moses. The entire Exodus story as recounted in the Bible probably never occurred. The same is true of the tumbling of the walls of Jericho. And David, far from being the fearless king who built Jerusalem into a mighty capital, was more likely a provincial leader whose reputation was later magnified to provide a rallying point for a fledgling nation.

Such startling propositions — the product of findings by archaeologists digging in Israel and its environs over the last 25 years — have gained wide acceptance among non- Orthodox rabbis. But there has been no attempt to disseminate these ideas or to discuss them with the laity — until now.

The United Synagogue of Conservative Judaism, which represents the 1.5 million Conservative Jews in the United States, has just issued a new Torah and commentary, the first for Conservatives in more than 60 years. Called "Etz Hayim" ("Tree of Life" in Hebrew), it offers an interpretation that incorporates the latest findings from archaeology, philology, anthropology and the study of ancient cultures. To the editors who worked on the book, it represents one of the boldest efforts ever to introduce into the religious mainstream a view of the Bible as a human rather than divine document.

"When I grew up in Brooklyn, congregants were not sophisticated about anything," said Rabbi Harold Kushner, the author of "When Bad Things Happen to Good People" and a co-editor of the new book. "Today, they are very sophisticated and well read about psychology, literature and history, but they are locked in a childish version of the Bible."

"Etz Hayim," compiled by David Lieber of the University of Judaism in Los Angeles, seeks to change that. It offers the standard Hebrew text, a parallel English translation (edited by Chaim Potok, best known as the author of "The Chosen"), a page-by-page exegesis, periodic commentaries on Jewish practice and, at the end, 41 essays by prominent rabbis and scholars on topics ranging from the Torah scroll and dietary laws to ecology and eschatology.

These essays, perused during uninspired sermons or Torah readings at Sabbath services, will no doubt surprise many congregants. For instance, an essay on Ancient Near Eastern Mythology," by Robert Wexler, president of the University of Judaism in Los Angeles, states that on the basis of modern scholarship, it seems unlikely that the story of Genesis originated in Palestine. More likely, Mr. Wexler says, it arose in Mesopotamia, the influence of which is most apparent in the story of the Flood, which probably grew out of the periodic overflowing of the Tigris and Euphrates rivers. The story of Noah, Mr. Wexler adds, was probably borrowed from the Mesopotamian epic Gilgamesh.

Equally striking for many readers will be the essay "Biblical Archaeology," by Lee I. Levine, a professor at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem. "There is no reference in Egyptian sources to Israel's sojourn in that country," he writes, "and the evidence that does exist is negligible and indirect." The few indirect pieces of evidence, like the use of Egyptian names, he adds, "are far from adequate to corroborate the historicity of the biblical account."

Similarly ambiguous, Mr. Levine writes, is the evidence of the conquest and settlement of Canaan, the ancient name for the area including Israel. Excavations showing that Jericho was unwalled and uninhabited, he says, "clearly seem to contradict the violent and complete conquest portrayed in the Book of Joshua." What's more, he says, there is an "almost total absence of archaeological evidence" backing up the Bible's grand descriptions of the Jerusalem of David and Solomon.

The notion that the Bible is not literally true "is more or less settled and understood among most Conservative rabbis," observed David Wolpe, a rabbi at Sinai Temple in Los Angeles and a contributor to "Etz Hayim." But some congregants, he said, "may not like the stark airing of it." Last Passover, in a sermon to 2,200 congregants at his synagogue, Rabbi Wolpe frankly said that "virtually every modern archaeologist" agrees "that the way the Bible describes the Exodus is not the way that it happened, if it happened at all." The rabbi offered what he called a "litany of disillusion" about the narrative, including contradictions, improbabilities, chronological lapses and the absence of corroborating evidence. In fact, he said, archaeologists digging in the Sinai have "found no trace of the tribes of Israel — not one shard of pottery."

The reaction to the rabbi's talk ranged from admiration at his courage to dismay at his timing to anger at his audacity. Reported in Jewish publications around the world, the sermon brought him a flood of letters accusing him of undermining the most fundamental teachings of Judaism. But he also received many messages of support. "I can't tell you how many rabbis called me, e- mailed me and wrote me, saying, `God bless you for saying what we all believe,' " Rabbi Wolpe said. He attributes the "explosion" set off by his sermon to "the reluctance of rabbis to say what they really believe."

Before the introduction of "Etz Hayim," the Conservative movement relied on the Torah commentary of Joseph Hertz, the chief rabbi of the British Commonwealth. By 1936, when it was issued, the Hebrew Bible had come under intense scrutiny from scholars like Julius Wellhausen of Germany, who raised many questions about the text's authorship and accuracy. Hertz, working in an era of rampant anti-Semitism and of Christian efforts to demonstrate the inferiority of the "Old" Testament to the "New," dismissed all doubts about the integrity of the text.

Maintaining that no people would have invented for themselves so "disgraceful" a past as that of being slaves in a foreign land, he wrote that "of all Oriental chronicles, it is only the Biblical annals that deserve the name of history."

The Hertz approach had little competition until 1981, when the Union of American Hebrew Congregations, the official arm of Reform Judaism, published its own Torah commentary. Edited by Rabbi Gunther Plaut, it took note of the growing body of archaeological and textual evidence that called the accuracy of the biblical account into question. The "tales" of Genesis, it flatly stated, were a mix of "myth, legend, distant memory and search for origins, bound together by the strands of a central theological concept." But Exodus, it insisted, belonged in "the realm of history." While there are scholars who consider the Exodus story to be "folk tales," the commentary observed, "this is a minority view."

Not among Orthodox Jews, however. They continue to regard the Torah as the divine and immutable word of God. Their most widely used Torah commentary, known as the Stone Edition (1993), declares in its introduction "that every letter and word of the Torah was given to Moses by God."

Lawrence Schiffman, a professor at New York University and an Orthodox Jew, said that "Etz Hayim" goes so far in accepting modern scholarship that, without realizing it, it ends up being in "nihilistic opposition" to what Conservative Jews stand for. He noted, however, that most of the questions about the Bible's accuracy had been tucked away discreetly in the back. "The average synagogue-goer is never going to look there," he said.

Even some Conservative rabbis feel uncomfortable with the depth of the doubting. "I think the basic historicity of the text is valid and verifiable," said Susan Grossman, the rabbi of Beth Shalom Congregation in Columbia, Md., and a co-editor of "Etz Hayim." As for the mounting archaeological evidence suggesting the contrary, Rabbi Grossman said: "There's no evidence that it didn't happen. Most of the `evidence' is evidence from silence."

"The real issue for me is the eternal truths that are in the text," she added. "How do we apply this hallowed text to the 21st century?" One way, she said, is to make it more relevant to women. Rabbi Grossman is one of many women who worked on "Etz Hayim," in an effort to temper the Bible's heavily patriarchal orientation and make the text more palatable to modern readers. For example, the passage in Genesis that describes how the aged Sarah laughed upon hearing God say that she would bear a son is traditionally interpreted as a laugh of incredulity. In its commentary, however, "Etz Hayim" suggests that her laughter "may not be a response to the far- fetched notion of pregnancy at an advanced age, but the laughter of delight at the prospect of two elderly people resuming marital intimacy."

In a project of such complexity, there were inevitably many points of disagreement. But Rabbi Kushner says the only one that eluded resolution concerned Leviticus 18:22: "Do not lie with a male as one lies with a woman; it is an abhorrence." "We couldn't come to a formulation that we could all be comfortable with," the rabbi said. "Some people felt that homosexuality is wrong. We weren't prepared to embrace that as the Conservative position. But at the same time we couldn't say this is a mentality that has been disproved by contemporary biology, for not everyone was prepared to go along with that." Ultimately, the editors settled on an anodyne compromise, noting that the Torah's prohibitions on homosexual relations "have engendered considerable debate" and that Conservative synagogues should "welcome gay and lesbian congregants in all congregational activities."

Since the fall, when "Etz Hayim" was issued, more than 100,000 copies have been sold. Eventually, it is expected to become the standard Bible in the nation's 760 Conservative synagogues.

Mark S. Smith, a professor of Bible and Near Eastern Studies at New York University, noted that the Hertz commentary had lasted 65 years. "That's incredible," he said. "If `Etz Hayim' isn't around for 50 years or more, I'd be surprised."

Its longevity, however, may depend on the pace of archaeological discovery."


The Hebrew (Habiru) stay in the failed Hyksos invasion and occupation of Egypt is where so much Egyptian religious ideas were learned, among them the Taurowet stability religious concept which became the basis of the idea of stability of the "Torah", the Jewish rendition of "Taurowet". But, the plagiarizers of Egypt's Taurowet theology based their theology on a racial selective basis that backfired against them all through their history as God wants no part of anti-Gentilism because God is with Humanity, all of it, not one self-selected group of it. That idea is crocodile thinking but there it is. The fact that that croc perpetually sits up there in the night sky as Draco riding next to the now forgotten Taurowet constellation. Judaism cannot die out as it's icon, just like Aquariana Christianity's, shows the Messiah/Christ/Anointed One, is part of the Zodiac, i.e., God's Sign = Nature.


 Modern Israel exposes Judaism's inherent racism


Doubling up on Judaism's inherent anti-Gentile racism, Israeli Jews have also imported European colonial racist imperialism attitudes towards the native Palestinian peoples. Below Israeli children are being taught hatred of Arabs. One often hears the Jewish complaint that Arabs teach their children to hate Jews. Few know that Israelis themselves teach their children hatred of Arabs.


Israeli children sign rockets shells destined to kill Palestinians


"Why we have a New Testament: "Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it from religious conviction." --Blaise Pascal, Pensees, 1670

"Moses may not have known about natural selection, but he transmitted his god's explicit commandment to kill and steal from out-group members as a recurrent major theme. Two distinct policies were put into effect. First, all members of nations located in the land that was to become Israel were to be killed outright. Subsequently, people in surrounding nations were to be killed unless they agreed to become subservient to Israel. Both policies are given in one passage of Deuteronomy (20:10-18; RSV), with instructions regarding people outside of Israel given first:

"When you draw near to a city to fight against it, offer terms of peace to it. And if its answer to you is peace and it opens to you, then all the people who are found in it shall do forced labor for you and shall serve you. But if it makes no peace with you, but makes war against you, then you shall besiege it; and when the LORD your God gives it into your hand you shall put all its males to the sword, but the women and the little ones, the cattle, and every- thing else in the city, all its spoil, you shall take as booty for yourselves; and you shall enjoy the spoil of your enemies, which the LORD your God has given you. Thus you shall do to all the cities which are very far from you, which are not cities of the nations here. "But in the cities of these peoples that the LORD your God gives you for an inheritance you shall save alive nothing that breathes, but you shall utterly destroy them, the Hittites and the Amorites, the Canaanites and the Perizzites, the Hivites and the Jebusites, as the LORD your God has commanded; that they may not teach you to do according to all their abominable practices which they have done in the service of their Gods, and so to sin against the LORD your God."

For prior occupants of the promised land, there can be no doubt that this meant genocide according to the word's modern definition (RSV): "They should be utterly destroyed, and should receive no mercy but be exterminated, as the LORD commanded Moses" (Joshua 11:20) . . . Utterly destroy all that they have; do not spare them, but kill both man and woman, infant and suckling" (I Samuel 15:3). And, as if they had a sense of Hamilton's (1964) inclusive fitness: "You will make them as a blazing oven when you appear. The LORD will swallow them up in his wrath; and fire will consume them. You will destroy their offspring from the earth, and their children from among the sons of men" (Psalms 21:9-10).

There can be no doubt that this commandment was mandatory, as Maimonides explained (Judges 5:4, italics not added; cf Elba 1995, Lior 1994): "It is a positive commandment to destroy the seven nations, as it is said: Thou shalt utterly destroy them. If one does not put to death any of them that falls into one's power, one transgresses a negative commandment, as it is said: Thou shalt save alive nothing that breatheth."

The Israelites' campaign to carry out their god's commandment to commit genocide against the native inhabitants of Canaan-cum-Palestine took several generations. It began with Joshua's massacre at Jericho. Contrary to the Christian song "Joshua Fought the Battle of Jericho," according to scripture there was no battle at all. It was a siege, at the end of which all of the city's inhabitants were killed except Rahab the prostitute (she and her family were spared in exchange for helping Joshua plan his strategy, Joshua 6:16-17, 19, 21, 24, RSV): Joshua said to the people, "Shout; for the LORD has given you the city. And the city and all that is within it shall be devoted to the LORD for destruction . . . But all silver and gold, and vessels of bronze and iron, are sacred to the LORD; they shall go into the treasury of the LORD." . . . Then they utterly destroyed all in the city, both men and women, young and old, oxen, sheep, and asses, with the edge of the sword . . . And they burned the city with fire, and all within it; only the silver and gold, and the vessels of bronze and of iron, they put into the treasury of the house of the LORD. The half-life and penetrance of such cultural legacies are often under-appreciated.

Some 3,000 years after the fall of Jericho, Israeli psychologist George Tamarin (1966, 1973) measured the strength of residual in-group morality. He presented Joshua 6:20-21 to 1,066 school children, ages 8-14, in order to test "the effect of uncritical teaching of the Bible on the propensity for forming prejudices (particularly the notion of the 'chosen people,' the superiority of the monotheistic religion, and the study of acts of genocide by biblical heroes)." The children's answers to the question "Do you think Joshua and the Israelites acted rightly or not?," were categorized as follows: "'A' means total approval, 'B' means partial approval or disapproval, and 'C' means total disapproval."

Across a broad spectrum of Israeli social and economic classes, 66% of responses were "A," 8% "B," and 26% "C." The "A" answers tended to be as straightforward as they were numerous (Tamarin, 1966): In my opinion Joshua and the Sons of Israel acted well, and here are the reasons: God promised them this land, and gave them permission to conquer. If they would not have acted in this manner or killed anyone, then there would be the danger that the Sons of Israel would have assimilated among the "Goyim." In my opinion Joshua was right when he did it, one reason being that God commanded him to exterminate the people so that the tribes of Israel will not be able to assimilate amongst them and learn their bad ways. Joshua did good because the people who inhabited the land were of a different religion, and when Joshua killed them he wiped their religion from the earth. Tamarin (1973) noted that: "C" classification [total disapproval] was accorded to all answers formally rejecting genocide, either on ethical or utilitarian grounds. This does not mean that all "C" responses reveal non-discriminatory attitudes. For example, one girl criticized Joshua's act, stating that "the Sons of Israel learned many bad things from the Goyim." . . . Another extremely racist response is that of a 10 year old girl disapproving the act, stating, "I think it is not good, since the Arabs are impure and if one enters an impure land one will also become impure and share their curse." Other misgivings included (1966): I think Joshua did not act well, as they could have spared the animals for themselves. I think Joshua did not act well, as he should have left the property of Jericho; if he had not destroyed the property it would have belonged to the Israelites.

In contrast to the established difference between boys and girls in propensity toward violence and approval of violence in general, with regard to biblically commanded genocide Tamarin found that "Contrary to our expectation, there was no difference, concerning this most cruel form of prejudice, between male and female examinees" (1973). Less surprising, but more alarming, nearly half of the children who gave "total approval" to Joshua's behavior also gave "A" responses to the hypothetical question: "Suppose that the Israeli Army conquers an Arab village in battle. Do you think it would be good or bad to act towards the inhabitants as Joshua did towards the people of Jericho?" Tamarin (1966) received such responses as these: In my opinion this behavior was necessary, as the Arabs are our enemies always, and the Jews did not have a country, and it was necessary to behave like that towards the Arabs. It would have been good to treat the Arabs as Joshua and his soldiers did, as they are Arabs; they hate and retaliate against us all the time, and if we exterminate them as Joshua did, they won't be able to show themselves as greater heroes than we. I think it was good because we want our enemies to be conquered, and to widen our frontiers, and we should kill the Arabs as Joshua and the Israelites did. Some respondents disapproved of Joshua's campaign (answer "C"), but approved of similar acts if committed by Israeli soldiers. One girl disapproved of Joshua "because it is written in the Bible, 'don't kill'," but she approved of the conjectured Israeli Army action, stating "I think it would be good, as we want our enemies to fall into our hands, enlarge our frontiers, and kill the Arabs as Joshua did."

As a control group, Tamarin tested 168 children who were read Joshua 6:20-21 with "General Lin" substituted for Joshua and a "Chinese Kingdom 3000 years ago" substituted for Israel. General Lin got a 7% approval rating, with 18% giving partial approval or disapproval, and 75% disapproving totally."

© John Hartung Ph.D.


Anti-Gentilism, anti-Christianity verses are found in the Talmud


"Blessed are You HaSHem our G~d, King of the universe who: -Gave the heart understanding to distinquish between day and night. -Did not make me a gentile. -Did not make me a slave. -Did not make me a woman. -Gives sight to the blind. -Clothes the naked. -Releases the bound. -Straightens the bent. -Spreads out the earth upon the waters. -Has provided for my needs. -Establishes the footsteps of man. -Grids Israel with strength. -Crowns Israel with splendor. -Gives to the weary strength. Shema, Israel, our L~rd HaShem is One!"

From the Shema, Judaism's most sacred prayer

The Jewish people teach themselves to be ever-watchful of criticism of Judaism, Zionism, or modern Israel. They are quick to label anyone "anti-Semitic" who criticizes these things. What they never reveal though is the fact that of all three traditional Abrahamic religions, Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, only one of these, Judaism, contains religious instructions that tell Jewish believers to hate another religion--Christianity, to hate the founder of that religion--Jesus Christ, and to value half the human race, women, as less than men as well as devaluing the vast majority of humanity, Gentiles, as less than Jews, actually less than human beings in their G-d's eyes.

Listed below is a sampling of some of the Talmud's anti-Gentile, anti-Christian instructions based on hatred. Jews will deny these are in the Talmud but they are there in the old unrevised Talmuds.

(These are but a few of dozens found in Talmudic texts.)

bulletIf a gentile hits a Jew, the gentile must be killed.--Babylonian Talmud, Sanhedrin 58b
bulletSouls of gentiles have unclean origins.--Zohar (1, 46b, 47a)
bulletThose who do good to Christians never rise from the dead.--Zohar (1, 25b)
bulletJews are called men but Christians are not called men.--Iebhammoth (61a)
bulletIt is permitted to deceive Christians.--Babha Kama (113b)
bulletKill those who give Israelite money to Christians.--Choschen Ham (388, 15)
bulletChristians are to be destroyed as idolators.--Zohar (11, 19a)
bulletEven the best of the Goyim should be killed. --Abhodah Zarah (26b)
bulletIf a Jew kills a Christian he commits no sin.--Sepher Or Israel (177b)
bulletExtermination of Christians is a necessary sacrifice.--Zohar (L, 28b, 39a)
bulletMake no agreements and show no mercy to Christians. --Hikhoth Akum (X,1)
bulletMarriage between Christians and Jews nullified. --Eben Haezar (44,8)


Torah Jews against Zionism


"From the inception of the Zionist State and particularly in recent times, the impression has been created in the World that there is some connection between the State, which falsely calls itself Israel, and the Jewish people as a whole. Therefore, we who continue to uphold the never-changing tradition of the Jewish people find it proper to again clarify the following points:

A Jew is one who remains faithful to the laws of the Jewish religion, that is, the Holy Torah and its commandments. The Jewish people became a people before they had their own land, and continued to exist as a people also after they went Into exile, because our very peoplehood is based exclusively on the Torah. The Holy Land was given to the Jewish people on the condition that they observe the Torah and its commandments. When they failed to do this, their sovereignty over the land was taken from them, and they went into exile. From that time, we are prohibited by the Torah with a very grave prohibition to establish a Jewish independent sovereignty in the Holy Land or anywhere throughout the world. Rather, we are obligated to be loyal to the nations under whose protection we dwell.

This situation has existed for close to 2000 years when the Jewish people were dispersed throughout all corners of the world. During this time, the Jews always remained faithful to the country in which they lived. The Jewish people are grateful to all those merciful nations which have allowed them to observe Torah and the commandments undisturbed. From ancient times, the relations between the Jewish and Islamic peoples have always been those of peace and brotherhood, and friendship always reigned between them. The proof of this is the fact that for centuries, in all the Arab lands, hundreds of thousands of Jews lived in honor and amidst mutual esteem. Jews throughout all generations yearned to grace the sacred soil of the Holy Land and to live there. However, their sole purpose was to fulfill the commandments dependent upon the land and to absorb Its holiness. Never, G-d forbid, did they have any nationalist or sovereign intent whatsoever which, as mentioned above, is forbidden to us. Indeed, also here in the Holy Land, our fathers lived in neighborly harmony with the Palestinian residents of the land, helping one another, to mutual benefit.

Until about two hundred years ago, the vast majority of Jews observed the Torah and the commandments in entirety. Jewry's leaders were Torah scholars, who directed the people according to the Torah. They were loyal citizens in the host nations where they dwelled and to the local laws. They prayed for the welfare of their respective governments. To our sorrow, at that time, new winds of "freedom and equality" began to blow in Europe. A small number of Jews were lured by this spirit and slowly left their observance of Torah and commandments. Together with this, they began to deride the spiritual leadership of their people. This assimilation was the basis upon which, one hundred years ago, the ideology of Zionism was born. Its founders were assimilated Jews who had abandoned the Torah. Immediately at the founding of the Zionist movement, masses of Jews under the leadership of their Rabbis, launched a heavy battle against Zionism. Their attack was directed not only at the non-religious Zionist idea, but rather, primarily at its opposition to the Torah-ordained path that Jewry must follow while in exile. As such, the Zionists incited the nations of the world, demanding political sovereignty over the Holy Land while remaining oblivious to the resentment this would arouse In the Palestinian Arabs, the land's veteran inhabitants. As stated, the leaders of Orthodox Jewry vehemently opposed the movement with all force. The Zionists refused to heed the voice of the Rabbis and Torah authority. They persisted in their ways until they succeeded in influencing the British government to issue the Balfour Declaration concerning the "establishment of a national home for the Jews in the land of Israel." To our great sorrow, from that point on began the deterioration of the good relations between the Jews and the Arab inhabitants of the land. This occurred because the Arab people understood that the Zionists wished to seize rulership from them. In addition, the Arab people had suspicions as if the Jewish people wished to seize control of the Temple Mount and other similar sites. Matters worsened as a result. The Jewish leadership of that time saw it as proper to clarify before the Arab leaders that the Torah-true Jews had no desire whatsoever for sovereignty, and that our desire was to continue to live in peace with the Arabs, as we had always done. The leader of the G-d-fearing Jewish community at that time, Rabbi Yoseph Chaim Zonnenfeld. of blessed memory, organized a delegation in July of 24' which visited King Hussein and his sons Faisal the King of Iraq and the Amir Abdullah In order to lucidly present to them the position of the G-d-fearing Jewish community. The Jewish delegation clarified unequivocally that Torah Jewry is totally opposed to the Zionist sovereignty over the Holy Land. It Is worth noting that the delegation was received with great honor. They were even assured that all Arab lands were completely open to Jews, however, on the condition that the Jews do not demand political rights. This condition also applied to the Holy Land. One of the members of the Jewish delegation, Professor Yisroel Yaakov De Haan, paid with his life for his participation.

Torah Jewry protests at every opportunity against the Zionist rule over the Holy Land, and the Zionist rebellion against the neighboring nations. Torah Jewry has condemned the Zionist oppression of the Palestinians, the land's veteran inhabitants who have been driven from their homes and properties. The Zionists' barbaric and violent deeds are absolutely antithetical to the essence of the Jewish people. Torah Jewry has never ever recognized the Zionist state. Since the Zionists succeeding in establishing their state, Torah Jewry has continuously announced to the world that the Zionists do not represent the Jewish people, and that the name "Israel" that they use is a forgery. For as has been stated above, it is forbidden to us from the Torah to rebel against the nations, and all sovereignty by us is prohibited. Rather, we await the days when all the world will recognize the sovereignty of the Creator, and the words of the prophet Isaiah will yet be fulfilled: "And they will beat their swords into plowshares and their spears into pruning hooks. No nation will lift its sword against any other, nor will they learn warfare anymore." Anti-Zionist Orthodox Jews have refrained to this day from taking any funds from the Zionist regime, whether for their educational institutions, synagogues or other benefits. Obviously, they do not participate in the Zionist elections, whether for the "Knesset" or for the municipality. We do not serve in their army, and we even avoid speaking in the Hebrew language that the Zionists Invented. (incidentally, this is not the holy and true Hebrew language in which the Bible is written.) All this is done because Torah Jewry does not recognize the Zionist regime, which Is against the Torah and against humanity. Lately, the question has once again arisen concerning the Temple Mount and sovereignty over it. Thus, we wish to state unequivocally: a) In our time, it is a severe Torah prohibition for any Jew to set foot on any part of the Temple Mount area. b) The Jewish people have no claim whatsoever to sovereignty over this holy site, which is under Islamic authority, nor over any other holy site. Rabbi Zonenfeld was once asked, "is it true, that the Rabbi prefers an non-Jewish government over all of the Holy Land"? Rabbi Zonenfeld replied, "if King Hussein would rule over Palestine, the holiness of the Holy Land would not be diminished to even to an Iota degree". We yearningly await G-d's great day, when He will return His Divine Presence to Zion, restoring the holy city to its former holiness and glory as in days of old, to be a light to the peoples and the nations. The Zionists have no right of any sovereignty over even one inch of the Holy Land. They do not represent the Jewish people in any way whatsoever. They have no right to speak in the name of the Jewish people. Therefore, their words, declarations and actions are not in any way representative of the Jewish people. This is because the Zionists' seizing of power over the Holy Land is antithetical to Jewish law, and also because the Zionists do not behave like Jews at all rather, they desecrate the sanctity of the land. We once again clarify that it is our desire to live in peace with our Arab and Palestinian neighbors, as we did before the Zionist revolution, and as Jews all over the world till today live, accepting the yoke of rulership of their host nation, with complete loyalty. Our sole desire is to serve our G-d and to fulfill His commandments with a perfect heart and to delight in the radiance of the sanctity of the Land. "


Reformed Judaism is OK and Jewish Culture is Great


Jewish culture is kept alive because of its recognized talent value as are the basic Jewish religious ideas except the racist component of traditional Judaism has been abolished. Israel must go. It's too racist to defend morally. That's really all it takes to bring Judaism in line with modern liberal democratic social ideals that exceed the human rights commandments or lack of them found in ancient religious social instructions.



From Internet discussions with Jewish posters



The rejection of Yahweh as an imposter god by the old Gnostics was right on the money but their conclusions about Yahweh's role as Maker of a botched job of Creation is way off the mark. I found this out when God led me in 1998 to discover Jesus' "Abba", His true "Daddy" who was never Yahweh but God Most High, EL Elyon. Before I found about EL as He was worshiped by ancient Canaanites prior to the later Hebrews, I was stuck like many a Christian before me with the inability to recognize the Old Testament God of Israel as the same God who taught Jesus such compassionate and wise teachings. Like Rastafarians I accepted a recreated Yahweh as "Jah", a God of Love, but still knowing it's a man-made artifice as the Bible god surely shows little sign as a God of Love until the time the Spirit of Christ descended on the Holy Land between 100 BC and 100 A.D. and caused the inspiration of a new type of Messiah or at least one completely different from the Davidic Warrior King Messiah the Jews were led to expect and still expect. But then in 1998 God guided me to the right information by a good friend handing me a book and saying, "Read this and tell me what you think of it."

The book was Semitic Languages Prof. John Gray's Near Eastern Mythologies and in it I found Jesus' heavenly Father. The way the Canaanites related to EL Elyon was much different than the Jews and all Abrahamics taught to fear the Lord, your God. Besides the usual "EL the Compassionate One" which Yahweh also claimed and even Allah, both of them utterly cruel and unforgiving to anyone who dared cross their commands, EL was known as The Kindly One, The Friendly One. Canaanites were so comfortable with their highest God that they could make jokes about His foibles, much like Greeks did with their Zeus and his shenanigans. Can you imagine Jewish believers calling YHWH, "the Friendly One"? As if..But it still was to EL Elyon that Canaanites turned to for forgiveness of their sins which He forgave without any Canaanite cuniform record I know of of EL ever condemning a human being to any hell. EL ruled Creation through the lower gods and goddesses that's why in the Hebrew word for the Canaanite Divine Assembly, it's "Elohim" showing EL's position at the head of the pantheon of gods. There are still traces of this original Canaanite relationship of EL to the lower gods and Yahweh as a son of EL in Deuteronomy 32 in Hebrew translation and in Psalms 82 and 86.

In 1998 having found Jesus' true Daddy I had resolved the Christian problem with the Old Testament God of Israel. Yahweh was a fraud just as the old Gnostics thought he was but they still credited Yahweh for making Creation a trap for the soul and therefore making the material world something to be considered bad and to be avoided in getting entangled in, very much a Buddhist-like idea, as much as possible. Become "passers-by". The old Gnostics never found EL because when they were delving into Scriptures and all sorts of ancient religious knowledge, probably at the Library of Alexandria, there wasn't the Canaanite cuniform texts from ancient Canaan around to tell the story of EL before the Jewish makeover into YHWH. No science of archeology then. But now the Canaanite cuniform texts tell of a very different God Most High than the God of Israel. I urge all Christians to read Near Eastern Mythologies and reconnect with Jesus' heavenly Father.

In 1998 I realized Christians would eventually have to make what I called an "Armageddon Choice", whether they would continue following Yahweh, the tribal war god of Israel and the Hebrews, or whether they would follow EL Elyon, God Most High, Jesus' heavenly Father, the God at the head of the Elohim, or "Divine Assembly", the Canaanite name for which was translated into Greek as "Armageddon". EL vs. Yahweh. You can't serve two masters at once or ride two horses or pull two bowstrings at the same time as the wisdom goes. A choice between EL and Yahweh was inevitable in my opinion.

In 2001 I think it was, Israeli archeologist Israel Finkelstein and Israeli historian Neil Silberman published their findings about the people who wrote the Bible. There's a new video on their work and book, called The Bible Unearthed. Megiddo turns out to be the best archeological site found in the Holy Land for showing differing ancient groups who lived there as Megiddo sits in a strategic valley through which ancient Canaanite/Palestinian groups traveled north and south. The layers of town strata revealed that the people who wrote the Bible stories, the Hebrew/Jews, can only be traced as far back as 700 BC which means all the Bible Torah stories of a fabulous earlier past are bunk, just Jewish myths of origin like most all ethnic groups create to explain themselves. The Jewish myths escaped intellectual scrutiny for so long because of Christianity's protection, that protect now slipping away with scholarship, but still holding with Muslims who will be the last to absorb the fact all the Abrahamic religions are toast as far as holding any spiritual authority. You can't get spiritual authority from liars and their lies.

Armageddon has come to all Abrahamic religions, including Pauline Christianity because Paul reattached Christianity back to the Jewish Bible as spiritual authority. Only the Gnostic Christian spiritual path was free of the Bible deceptions and true to God's timing, there's now a brand new modern Gnostic Christianity that lifts Christianity above the coming End Times fate for Pauline Christianity and all the Abrahamic Bible based religions. I am a Gnostic Christian visionary who's been getting spiritual visions and revelations on and off for the past 33 years and this year, God led me to rediscovering and recovering the Celestial Christianity information that proves the Messiah-Christ-Anointed One tradition is far older than Christianity or even the Abrahamic religions. You see for yourselves how the Celestial Tauret was born in ancient Egyptian astrologically based religion and was one of many religious ideas later Jews took out of Egypt to remake and claim as their original beliefs. But as the original Celestial Tauret gave true spiritual knowledge and thereby social wisdom and stability to ancient Egypt, the Torah in Jewish hands created a tribal nation fraught from the beginning with troubles and instability as well as a national lifespan measuring in a few hundred years vs. thousands for the Egyptians. Celestial Christianity, the way God is reestablishing "all things" in order to make straight the right pathway to the Spirit of Christ knowledge being evolved in the Sign of Aquarius.

But it's all Hypocrisy, Judaism vipers, your phony "humanitarianism" that hides the racist "me first" core of this terrible and quite politically manipulated CULT ideology--where European Jewish converts pretend to be Semites with some sort of "Right" to be in a land none of their ancestors ever set foot in. You, us, Ashkenazim have ZERO right to tell the world anything about Palestine as we are all accomplices to Israel's Crime Against Humanity, the robbing of Palestine from Palestinians.

Judaism fostered this horrible political crime against Palestinians as it teaches Jews through the Zionist ideology that is the Jewish version of Manifest Destiny, not to recognize the human rights of anyone in the way of Eretz Yisrael Jews. People in the way are considered animals to be destroyed or removed one way or another. Hatred of Arabs, the Amalek campaign still in progress after 2500 years, sees to it Jews learn to hate the people they've invaded and make them unable to think rationally about the lunacy of European immigrants invading a Middle East country with practically zero intention of ever making friends with the people they've invaded or any of the surrounding Arab neighbors. It is Judaism that runs this throwback to ancient religious warfare that has picked up again due to Israel being the Crime Against Humanity--

Do you talk about this with any compassion for Pals? Nope, it's trying to one-upmanship each other over the buzz words of exclusion to outsiders, those priesthood manipulations meant to do exactly what they do--keep you mesmerized with Cult identification so you won't speak up publicly about the horror of Israelis getting to continue to commit their Crime Against Humanity.

And btw, now that the Celestial Tauret has been recovered, Judaism has no spiritual authority whatsoever as how could it? Not when not any rabbi cannot tell anyone where Judaism's main doctrine of the Torah came from--again the buzz word fabricators made up their own earthly torah ideas that completely scotched the real deal, the Tauret of God's heavenly Sign Language, written permanently in the stars. Without you knowing about the Saturn/Aquarius=EL Elyon/Messiah relationship, you know zip about Moshiach which should be spelled Musa as Moshe tells you nothing about the Aquarius origin to Musa's name, or the Aquarius/Man relationship that is found in the Merkabah astrological symbolism that isn't subject to priesthood manipulation as were the "Word of God" Judah texts.

When your ready to admit your spiritual and moral errors, come see me to learn about the Celestial Tauret and learn where ancient Hebrews got their original idea of a spiritual bond between God and the Jewish Messiah as a Cosmic Humanitarian Archetype. You can spend your lifetimes wasting it on trying to correct Judaism's Fatal Flaws but they can't be corrected--only moving on to the Higher Consciousness of true Messiah worship where there cannot be ANY hint of religious warfare--the Man Sign forbids it as Aquarius is the repository of God's evolving Humanitarian Archetype, meant to guide humanity into becoming truly humane beings. Without ability to identify with ALL of humanity, your religion lacks the ability to go past tribal xenophobia--as modern Israel so blatantly exhibits in its hatred and war against the native peoples who are the only ones in the world to carry real Hebrew/Israelite heredity.

*        *


rebbe...you guys, (and it is "guys" always..) don't even know where "rebbe", rabbi, the word comes from. Just like you don't know where the word "Torah" originated. You think because you've been taught this all your life and it's traditional that rabbis know what they're talking about but it isn't so. Like you, they are not taught to seek real knowledge of Judaism but to learn how to be good little robots and follow the very nasty priesthoods of Judah who concocted their religion of war by twisting the pagan religions whose beliefs they adopted and then denied doing so. "Rebbe", rabbi, this word is another borrowed Hindu Brahmin religion derived word, this one coming from "ravi", "of the Sun, as Brahma was a sun god in the Hindu Vedic Trinity.

When no rabbi or rebbe knows the origin of the word "Torah" it takes religious fanaticism to continue to adhere to false, borrowed but in denial priesthoods lies and very bad leadership, but here you are, the Jewish equivalents to the Evangelicals and just as learned as they are going to Bible Colleges instead of real centers of learning -- higher educational universities. It's very like the fact you can't see that God's real "Word of God" are not found in any single set of human religious production but in the whole dang Library, from the childrens books all the way to the phone directories, that's God's Word of God depositories, while you stick your heads in the sand in your "Book" and ignore truth all around you.

I teach Celestial Tauret as no rebbis, rabbis, or ravis know it any longer if they ever did. And without knowledge of the origin of Tauret, you can never learn about Musa's astrological connection to Jesus Christ and all the Water God Aquarius roles that define Judeo-Christianity, or Jewish Christianity, the real spiritual inheritor of the Celestial Tauret, the real foundation of the earthly Tauret and not the phony political counterfeit of Judah priests and rabbis.

*         *



All of you need to reread the Torah about how Moshe orders the slaughter of several thousand Israelites who balked at accepting his new idea of God as another Akhenaton fanatical possession of a new priesthood of ONE GOD worshipers. There you will see the biblical precedent that Muhammad took, that ISIS now takes, as religious precedent for killing critics of totalitarian religious belief, the ones that Jews would be landing in prison for if they were dumb enough to follow in our modern times. Killing your uppity son because he gives you lip isn't exactly acceptable parental behavior these days. Still, Cult loyalty oath allegiance instilled in you demands you accept moral crap and like it, like genocidal stories as foundation for modern Jewish acts of murderous insanity, like founding ISIS/RA/EL again as European Jewish convert descendants pretending to be "Semites" and willing to kill innocents in the way of Eretz Yisrael, the storybook Torah land that never was but only in Jewish myths of origin. It is terrible the way religious fanaticism continues to teach religious war to every new generation of Jews instead of learning the Celestial Tauret, spelled the Arabic way because unlike the Hebrew misdirections, Arabic shows the Egyptian origins of "born out of water", the Aquarius mark that defines all of Judeo-Christianity.

And it is deliberately a throwback to Elohim worship where God is still known as the Holy Family and not the phony Akhenaton totalitarian Sun God who tries to rid the Celestial skies of worship of any other celestial deities. Do you know about the way ancient Hebrews worshiped God Most High through the Israelite tribal god Yahweh as a "Great Angel" as Prof. Margaret Barker shows in her scholarship? This was where later Jewish Christianity evolved, from these people symbolized as backsliding Israelites in the Judah concoction of Moses and the Exodus Story written in Judah--the Israelites who built the Golden Calf to worship God through, where EL, the Most High, had His totem animal as the Bull, so the Calf would be appropriate symbolism in such ancient Canaanite/Hebrew worship. Not to be allowed on pain of death and yet God didn't think so and rebirthed Jewish Christianity, then given immense political power through Roman Empire, then Europe, then world adoption as Roman Christianity now, no longer Jewish Christianity.

I represent the same Gnostic rebirth movement that Pauline Christianity faces -again. Because before Rome got rid of the Gnostic Christian movement, Judah got rid of Jewish Christianity, the Old Time Religion of Hebrews worshiping God via a Cosmic Christ type of Messiah. As Judaism is destroyed by historical and archaeological recovery God has restored the lost Celestial Tauret and now Jewish Christianity is reborn to guide ALL Jews, ALL Gentiles, to the true Humanitarian Archetype, that Moshe could never be, nor Paul, nor Muhammad, all of them killers of men with blood on their hands. You can't get true spiritual authority from such men. But you can get it from the Spirit of Christ that carries the Messianic Message lost in Judaism but recovered in Celestial Christianity.

*         *


biomystic May 20, 2016

I am Ashkenazi and Sephardic in my Jewish ancestry and when confirming this ancestry with DNA testing of my mother’s genetic history I found that I had Ashkenazim ancestors and relatives from all over Europe, from Netherlands to Germany to Poland, Ukraine, Lithuania, Slovakia, Austria-Hungary but it stopped in the direct of Palestine at Uzbekistan which was centered in the old Khazar Kingdom said to have converted to Judaism in the 8th century to avoid wars with Christian and Muslim armies at their borders. I have now become aware that there is a Zionist push to promote ridiculous genetic ancestry of us Ashkenazim by trying to say we have Palestinian Jewish genes in us making us “Jews” in order to claim the Zionist “Right of Return” to Palestine. Well, I now warn people who are being taken in by Jewish geneticists fudging Mendelian genetic rules in order to promote a historical lie. I challenge fellow Ashkenazim to have their DNA analyzed in non-Jewish genetic research labs to see for themselves that the Khazar Jewish convert theory is not just theory but true.

People not knowing Mendelian genetic rules are being made fools of as one can find out for yourself by doing the math of genetic transmission. Let’s give Ashkenazim in Central Asia/Europe “Four Jewish mothers from Palestine” or even 70 rabbis from Palestine and they mate with Khazar Kingdom pagans who have been ordered to convert. What happens when these Palestinian genes from four Palestinian Jewish mothers or 70 Palestinian rabbis meet with the Central Asia/European populations? The first generations are 50/50 Palestinian/European. The second generations are 25%/75% Palestinian/European. The third generation are 12.5% Palestinian/87.5% European. The fourth generation is 6.25% Palestinian/93.75% European, and so by the fifth or six generation, or in 120 years given 20 years to a generation, the Palestinian genetic contribution is practically nil. It’s been over 1200 years since the Khazar Kingdom converted and thus all that Zionist “We are Semites” claim is pure Zionist propaganda being used as a weapon by Israeli Zionists to remove Palestinians from Palestine. You can no longer trust Jewish genetics and that Cohen business needs Gentile genetic peer review as it seems highly suspicious to this Ashkenazim/Sephardic Jew.

*         *



The End of Rabbinical Authority

with the discovery and recovery of the Celestial Tauret